Nick Statt for The Verge: Undercover Facebook moderator was instructed not to remove fringe groups or hate speech – “A new documentary details how third-party Facebook moderators ignore the company’s rules … The accusation is a damning one, undermining Facebook’s claims that it is actively trying to cut down on fake news, propaganda, hate speech, and other harmful content that may have significant real-world impact.” The investigation focuses on CPL Resources, which provides a third-party content moderation service.
In an interview with Kara Swisher, Zuckerberg tries to explain why Facebook hasn’t simply taken down InfoWars presence on the platform, but simply moved them ‘down the line’ by reducing distribution. Hmm. Good interview, though, and lots of glimpses into the man’s head.
The Register: ‘Elders of the Internet’ apologise for social media, recommend Trump filters to fix it – “‘USENET was a pretty clear warning’ of things to come, says new draft IETF standard” I don’t think this IETF draft is entirely serious, but perhaps it should be. IT security remains fixated on technical security and has tended to fight shy of the psychosocial aspects of Internet interaction. Certainly the anti-malware industry in general could have paid more attention to the psychology of the victim than it has. And yes, USENET was a pretty good indication of how awful social media might (and did) turn out to be. And yes, abstention from social media and whisky do both have some appeal… A joke with teeth.